HELLENIC JOURNAL OF STEM EDUCATION
Review
Jul 20, 2026 6 4

A Systematic Review of the Literature on STEM Education with GIS

Gerasimos Konstantakatos 1 * ,
Lia Galani 2,
Eirini Chatzara 2
1 National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, EDIP/ASPETE2 National and Kapodistrian University of Athens* Corresponding Author
Hellenic Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 2026, 31-43, https://doi.org/10.51724/hjstemed.v5i1.46
Publication date: Jul 20, 2026
Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This systematic review examined the integration of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in STEM education. 17 peer-reviewed studies (2005–2025) were included from Scopus, ERIC, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar. Five research questions examined methodology, outcomes, educational levels, participants, and intervention types. Mixed methods dominated (n=7), with no strictly experimental designs identified. Integrative STEM was the most frequent outcome (n=8), and most studies reported simultaneous cognitive and affective gains. Of the 17 studies, 13 were empirical (direct educational interventions with identifiable participants) and informed the subsequent analyses. Research was concentrated at the secondary level (n=8), with students as primary participants and no in-service teachers designated as a primary group. Multidisciplinary contexts (n=10), mixed-method interventions (n=8), and extended-duration programs (n=10) defined the pedagogical profile. A number of gaps were identified including the absence of primary school research and the marked geographic concentration of American studies. Lastly, the findings highlight the need for rigorous designs, teacher-focused inquiry, and international comparative research.

KEYWORDS

STEM education geographic information systems GIS

CITATION (APA)

Konstantakatos, G., Galani, L., & Chatzara, E. (2026). A Systematic Review of the Literature on STEM Education with GIS. Hellenic Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.51724/hjstemed.v5i1.46
Harvard
Konstantakatos, G., Galani, L., and Chatzara, E. (2026). A Systematic Review of the Literature on STEM Education with GIS. Hellenic Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), pp. 31-43. https://doi.org/10.51724/hjstemed.v5i1.46
Vancouver
Konstantakatos G, Galani L, Chatzara E. A Systematic Review of the Literature on STEM Education with GIS. Hellenic Journal of STEM Education. 2026;5(1):31-43. https://doi.org/10.51724/hjstemed.v5i1.46
AMA
Konstantakatos G, Galani L, Chatzara E. A Systematic Review of the Literature on STEM Education with GIS. Hellenic Journal of STEM Education. 2026;5(1), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.51724/hjstemed.v5i1.46
Chicago
Konstantakatos, Gerasimos, Lia Galani, and Eirini Chatzara. "A Systematic Review of the Literature on STEM Education with GIS". Hellenic Journal of STEM Education 2026 5 no. 1 (2026): 31-43. https://doi.org/10.51724/hjstemed.v5i1.46
MLA
Konstantakatos, Gerasimos et al. "A Systematic Review of the Literature on STEM Education with GIS". Hellenic Journal of STEM Education, vol. 5, no. 1, 2026, pp. 31-43. https://doi.org/10.51724/hjstemed.v5i1.46

REFERENCES

  1. Al Mamun, M. R., Jackson, T., & White, G. (2015). Does the geography major fit in STEM? Journal of Geography and Geology, 7(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.5539/jgg.v7n1p27
  2. Allen, S., & Peterman, K. (2019). Evaluating informal STEM education: Issues and challenges in context. New Directions for Evaluation, 2019(161), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20354
  3. Baker, T. R., Battersby, S., Bednarz, S. W., Bodzin, A. M., Kolvoord, B., Moore, S., Sinton, D., & Uttal, D. (2015). A research agenda for geospatial technologies and learning. Journal of Geography, 114(3), 118-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2014.950684
  4. Baydas, O., Kucuk, S., Yilmaz, R. M., Aydemir, M., & Goktas, Y. (2015). Educational technology research trends from 2002 to 2014. Scientometrics, 105(1), 709-725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1709-0
  5. Bondarenko, O. V. (2025). Teaching geography with GIS: A systematic review, 2010-2024. Science Education Quarterly, 2(1), 24-40. https://doi.org/10.55056/seq.903
  6. Borowczak, M., & Burrows, A. (2016). GIS technology + socio-scientific issues = teacher and student learning. In Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1871-1879). AACE.
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  8. Cao, X., Lu, H., Wu, Q., & Hsu, Y. (2025). Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of STEM education on students' learning outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1579474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1579474
  9. Delparte, D. M., Richardson, R., Eitel, K., Matsaw, S., & Cohn, T. (2016). Promoting geoscience STEM interest in Native American students: GIS, geovisualization and reconceptualizing spatial thinking skills. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 15(5), 82-99.
  10. Ercan, S., Altan, E. B., Taştan, B., & Dağ, İ. (2016). Integrating GIS into science classes to handleSTEM education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(Special), 30-43.
  11. Franz-Odendaal, T. A., Blotnicky, K., French, F., & Joy, P. (2016). Experiences and perceptions of STEM subjects, careers, and engagement in STEM activities among middle school students in the Maritime Provinces. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(2), 153-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1166291
  12. Gopalan, M., Rosinger, K., & Ahn, J. B. (2020). Use of quasi-experimental research designs in education research: Growth, promise, and challenges. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 218-243. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903302
  13. Groshans, G., Mikhailova, E., Post, C., Schlautman, M., Carbajales-Dale, P., & Payne, K. (2019). Digital story map learning for STEM disciplines. Education Sciences, 9(2), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020075
  14. Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378
  15. Hadjimitsis, D. G., Kyriakides, P., Danezis, C., Akylas, E., Kyriakides, N., Papoutsa, C., Themistocleous, K., Eliades, M., Neophytou, M., Panayiotou, C., Tzouvaras, M., Prodromou, M., Argyriou, A., Nisantzi, A., & Komodromos, G. (2020). Exploring the importance of promoting Earth observation in education. In Earth Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing/GIS Applications XI (vol. 11534, pp. 277-296). SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2577890
  16. Havelčová, L., Hátlová, K., & Hanus, M. (2022). The limits of GIS implementation in education: A systematic review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11(12), 592. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11120592
  17. Hegarty, M. (2014). Spatial thinking in undergraduate science education. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 14(2), 142-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2014.889696
  18. Henry, P., & Semple, H. (2012). Integrating online GIS into the K-12 curricula: Lessons from Michigan's collaborative GIS. Journal of Geography, 111(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2011.583262
  19. Ivey, S. S., Best, R. M., Camp, C. V., & Palazolo, P. J. (2012). Transforming a civil engineering curriculum through GIS integration. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition 2012 (p. 25.1373). ASEE.
  20. Jant, E. A., Uttal, D. H., Kolvoord, R., James, K., & Msall, C. (2020). Defining and measuring the influences of GIS-based instruction on students' STEM-relevant reasoning. Journal of Geography, 119(1), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2019.1676819
  21. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (vol. 2, pp. 215-239). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  22. Kavouras, M., Kokla, M., Tomai, E., Darra, N., Baglatzi, A., Sotiriou, S. A., & Lazoudis, A. (2014). The GEOTHNK platform: Connecting spatial thinking to secondary education. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 754-758). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2014.220
  23. Kefalis, C., Skordoulis, C., & Drigas, A. (2025). Digital simulations in STEM education: Insights from recent empirical studies, a systematic review. Encyclopedia, 5(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5010010
  24. Kennedy, T. J., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2022). Introduction: The role of play and STEM in the early years. In S. D. Tunnicliffe, & T. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Play and STEM education in the early years: International policies and practices (pp. 3-37). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99830-1_1
  25. Kerski, J. J. (2015). GIS and STEM education[Unpublished manuscript]. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3075.3126
  26. Kolvoord, R. A., Uttal, D. H., & Meadow, N. G. (2011). Using video case studies to assess the impact of the use of GIS on secondary students' spatial thinking skills. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 21, 372-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.07.039
  27. Konstantakatos, G., & Galani, L. (2023). How is the use of GIS in geographical and environmental education evaluated? Findings from a systematic review. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 32(2), 159-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2022.2049170
  28. Lee, J., & Bednarz, R. (2009). Effect of GIS learning on spatial thinking. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260802276714
  29. Lindner, C., Müller, C., Hodam, H., Jürgens, C., Ortwein, A., Schultz, J., Selg, F., Weppler, J., & Rienow, A. (2019). Expanding STEM education in secondary schools: An innovative geography-physics course focusing on remote sensing. GI_Forum, 7, 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1553/giscience2019_02_s153
  30. Lohman, D. F. (1994). Spatial ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Encyclopedia of intelligence (vol. 2, pp. 1000-1007). Macmillan.
  31. Martín-Martín, A., Thelwall, M., Orduna-Malea, E., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2021). Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: A multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. Scientometrics, 126(1), 871-906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4
  32. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  33. National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11019
  34. Nazareth, A., Newcombe, N. S., Shipley, T. F., Velazquez, M., & Weisberg, S. M. (2019). Beyond small-scale spatial skills: Navigation skills and geoscience education. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 4, Article 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0167-2
  35. Newcombe, N. S. (2010). Picture this: Increasing math and science learning by improving spatial thinking. American Educator, 34(2), 29-35.
  36. Newman, M., & Gough, D. (2020). Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application. In O. Zawacki-Richter, M. Kerres, S. Bedenlier, M. Bond, & K. Buntins (Eds.), Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application (pp. 3-22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7_1
  37. Nugent, G., Barker, B., Grandgenett, N., & Adamchuk, V. (2009). The use of digital manipulatives in K-12: Robotics, GPS/GIS and programming. In Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2009.5350543
  38. Nugent, G., Barker, B., Grandgenett, N., & Adamchuk, V. I. (2010). Impact of robotics and geospatial technology interventions on youth STEM learning and attitudes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(4), 391-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782588
  39. Nugent, G., Barker, B., Welch, G., Grandgenett, N., Wu, C., & Nelson, C. (2015). A model of factors contributing to STEM learning and career orientation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(7), 1067-1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1017863
  40. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  41. Patterson, M. W., Reeve, K., & Page, D. (2003). Integrating geographic information systems into the secondary curricula. Journal of Geography, 102(6), 275-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340308978556
  42. Schulze, U. (2020). "GIS works!"—But why, how, and for whom? Findings from a systematic review. Transactions in GIS, 25(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12691
  43. Shiau, S. J., Huang, C. Y., Yang, C. L., & Juang, J. N. (2018). A derivation of factors influencing the innovation diffusion of the OpenStreetMap in STEM education. Sustainability, 10(10), 3447. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103447
  44. Srisawasdi, N. (2012). Fostering pre-service STEM teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge: A lesson learned from a case-based learning approach. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(8), 1356-1366.
  45. Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Pauw, J. B., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Van de Velde, D., Van Petegem, P., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525
  46. Uludüz, Ş. M., & Çalik, M. (2022). A thematic review of STEM education for disadvantaged students. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(4), 938-958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-022-00247-w
  47. Uttal, D. H., & Cohen, C. A. (2012). Spatial thinking and STEM education: When, why, and how? In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (vol. 57, pp. 147-181). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394293-7.00004-2
  48. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  49. Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817-835. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016127
  50. Xie, Y., & Reider, D. (2014). Integration of innovative technologies for enhancing students' motivation for science learning and career. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(3), 370-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9479-0
  51. Zuniga-Teran, A. A., Brown, A., Haverland, A., Mason, J., Bryson, M., Nichols, J., Schachter, J., Hunter, K., & Fimbres, E.. (2025). Increasing representation of minority students in STEM fields through multi-generational mentoring, real-world learning, and GIS training. Journal of STEM Outreach, 8(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v8i1.07

LICENSE

Creative Commons License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.